 |
Evidence suggests that in many middle- and upper-class households it
was common to have a local dressmaker come to the house twice a year or
so to make up on the premises things that were needed for the coming season.
This practice, widespread in the pre-World War I years, probably continued
for much longer than has previously been understood. Carolyn B. Reed,
chairman of the Arlington branch of the American Red Cross in 1946, wrote
a memoir of a day's shopping in 1910 for the Boston Herald. She
recalled that "nearly every home had its dress form...and its semi-annual
family dressmaker, augmented by a bi-weekly seamstress. These faithful
visitors moulded and worked on the necessary and serviceable blue serge
dress, or the broadcloths and silks to wear to church, as well as the
beautiful satin brocades and moirés for evening wear. Dress materials
such as these were the object [of the shopping trip]."(26) Ladies" Home Journal carried an advice article
in 1917 with the pointed title "Sewing in Other People's Homes."(27) One North Carolina woman, now in her eighties,
recalled having had dance dresses made up by her mother's favorite local
seamstress as late as the early 1930s. A New England woman recalled from
her childhood in the early 1910s that only basics -school skirts and blouses,
nightclothes, and flannel undergarments -issued from the needle of the
woman who visited twice a year, while special clothes were commissioned
from Boston or a local dressmaker who kept a shop.(28)
Women could also sew for themselves and their families. Mary Brooks Picken's
Woman's Institute ran correspondence courses in sewing and provided paperbound
booklets containing instruction on the principles of design, advice on
choosing patterns or reproducing simple garments, and illustrations showing
the proper methods of putting the garments together. In addition, the
final page of the booklet contained a list of examination questions, which
the correspondent answered on a special sheet of paper and sent in for
grading [fig. 82]. How-to-sew books and wardrobe-planning books were commonplace
commodities: for example, Dress and Look Slender, and Designing
Women: The Art, Technique and Cost of Being Beautiful.(29)
Home-economics textbooks for high-school and college students also focused
on sewing, choosing, and caring for clothes. One such book, Textiles
and Clothing by Ellen Beers McGowan and Charlotte A. Waite, was first
published in 1919, but revised by the authors in 1931 to keep up to date
with the increased use of synthetic fibers. Another textbook, The Arts
of Costume and Personal Appearance by Grace Margaret Morton, was published
in 1943. It should be remembered that home-economics classes were required
for girls (and only for girls) in public junior and senior high schools
until fairly recently and also that when higher education for women was
still controversial, choosing home economics as a college major was one
way to defuse the argument that attending college was unfeminine as well
as unnecessary.
|
 |