|   
             The Tirocchi Archive contains three boxes of vendor invoices and 
              letters, amounting to three cubic feet of records. This section 
              of the archive consists of business records and some household repair/maintenance 
              records. There is considerable documentation of the shops 
              purchases, including invoices, receipts, fabric samples, and correspondence. 
              These are loose papers arranged by supplier or vendor, as originally 
              organized, chronologically within alphabetical order. Some of the 
              papers are extremely fragile and brittle, making them difficult 
              to handle, so an archivist copied these documents onto acid-free 
              paper. 
            The bills from vendors are usually on their own printed invoice 
              forms. Sometimes, especially in the early years, they are handwritten, 
              but most are typewritten. Bills from Harry Angelo Company, Importers, 
              New York, one of the Tirocchis main suppliers, are stamped 
              in red, "POSITIVELY NO GOODS TAKEN BACK EXCEPT FOR IMPERFECTION." 
              However, a letter from same company in 1918 addressed to "The Misses 
              A. & L. Tirocchi," reads: 
            Ladies: Replying to your favor of the tenth instant regarding the 
              two pieces of satin which you want to return for credit, we wish 
              to say that under the existing circumstances, you are at liberty 
              to send them back to us, the full pieces, and we will send you a 
              credit check for same. 
            An invoice from the Alaska Fur Mfg. Co., New York City, dated 1915 
              and shipped C.O.D., bore the handwritten notation, "Subject Examination." 
            A series of letters in 1926 between the shop and an Italian linen 
              firm doing business as Linen Art in New York City chronicle a dispute 
              with Madame Tirocchi over her wish to return goods. The vendor is 
              adamant that Annas removal of the disputed merchandise from 
              their inventory cost them lost sales at Christmastime and because 
              of this, they refused to take the items back into stock. A letter 
              from another vendor informed Madame Tirocchi that it would be impossible 
              to accept returned goods because they consisted of "several odd 
              lengths which would mean they would be remnants to us." 
            These are the details from shop records that help round out for 
              the curators the relationship between A. & L. Tirocchi 
              and their suppliers. The vendor invoices and ledgers in the archive 
              reveal that many of the garments ordered by Anna were eventually 
              returned. In the Spring of 1925, Anna ordered approximately 100 
              dresses and returned at least seventeen. She was not the only retailer 
              to manage her inventory in this way and returns became a serious 
              problem for manufacturers and their suppliers. When a garment was 
              returned, manufacturers profits often decreased by 50% because 
              by the time the merchandise was sent back, it would be too late 
              in the season to sell it to another retailer except at a large discount. 
            Unfortunately, there is very little correspondence in the archive 
              to give us reasons for all of Annas returns. They have, however, 
              found a letter dating from 1925 to The New York Times from 
              a Kansas City retailer claiming that frequently garments purchased 
              from suppliers did not arrive in the correct sizes; could not be 
              sold to the customers who ordered them in the first place; or were 
              returned by customers, causing losses to both manufacturer and retailer. 
            The vendor invoices and receipts in the Tirocchi Archive will yield 
              information on a variety of subjects for years to come. As primary 
              documents, they have different meanings for all who examine them. 
              Someone looking to track fashion merchandise pricing will take one 
              strand of information from them. Someone else studying suppliers 
              in New York City during a certain period of time will take another. 
              The records remain the same.  
             
             ^back to top 
               
              >> explore other evidence discovered in 
              Vendor 
              Letters   
           |